Legal Opinion

Seneca Knitting Mills Corp. v. Wilkes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 23, 1986PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously modified, on the law, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: The court erred in denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment dismissing defendant’s tenth counterclaim. Defendant was an at-will employee since his employment was of unspecified duration, and as such, plaintiff had the unqualified right to discharge defendant for any reason other than a constitutionally impermissible purpose, a statutory proscription, or an express limitation in the individual contract of employment (see, Matter of Tyson v Hess, 109 AD2d…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. In re U. S. Pioneer Electronics Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Zimmerman v. Nassau HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Tiranno v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Tyson v. HessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wornick Co. v. CasasTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Wachtman v. Trocaire CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. In re Love Canal ActionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Brooks v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Cabell County Commission and Beth Thompson v. Joseph WhittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API