Legal Opinion

Lindstrom v. City of Mason City

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 11, 1964No. 51215PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnell, J.

— The sole question before us is the distinction, if any, between the responsibility of a city to persons using municipal facilities such as parks and the liability of other property owners to* invitees.

Under our cases there is a clear line of demarcation between the responsibility of a city and that of a business proprietor or owner to an invitee. The limitations on liability appearing in business-invitee cases do not appear in eases against a city.

Defendant, City of Mason City, is a municipal corporation. The city owns and operates a public library. To the south of the library building, but…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Atherton v. Hoenig's GrocerySupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  3. Soper v. Henry CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  4. Lacy v. City of OskaloosaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. Beach v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fetters Ex Rel. Fetters v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  2. Ehlinger v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  3. McGuire v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  4. Bauman v. City of WaverlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  5. Smith v. JC Penney CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API