Lindstrom v. City of Mason City
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtSnell, J.
— The sole question before us is the distinction, if any, between the responsibility of a city to persons using municipal facilities such as parks and the liability of other property owners to* invitees.
Under our cases there is a clear line of demarcation between the responsibility of a city and that of a business proprietor or owner to an invitee. The limitations on liability appearing in business-invitee cases do not appear in eases against a city.
Defendant, City of Mason City, is a municipal corporation. The city owns and operates a public library. To the south of the library building, but…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Atherton v. Hoenig's GrocerySupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- Soper v. Henry CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Lacy v. City of OskaloosaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Beach v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fetters Ex Rel. Fetters v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Ehlinger v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- McGuire v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- Bauman v. City of WaverlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- Smith v. JC Penney CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.