Legal Opinion
Hunter v. District of Columbia Child & Family Services Agency
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 11, 2010No. Civil No. 09-1491(RMC)PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
Ernest Hunter, pro se, sues his employer, the District of Columbia’s Child and Family Services Agency (“CFSA”), with a four count Complaint alleging discrimination, retaliation, and a hostile work environment in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16, as well as a claim under the D.C. Whistleblower Protection Act, D.C.Code § 1-615.54. CFSA moves to dismiss. As explained below, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part. The hostile work environment claim (Count III) will be dismissed for failure to state a claim because…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Ward v. D.C. Department of Youth Rehabilitation ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Judy Gordon v. United States Capitol PoliceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Wade v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Sledge v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.