Legal Opinion

Diehl v. Phillips Petroleum Company

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 7, 1962No. 39773PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

In their original petition, plaintiffs in error, hereafter referred to as “plaintiffs”, alleged five causes of action against the defendant in error, hereafter referred to as “defendant”. Therein plaintiffs alleged in substance that they owned an undivided interest in described land in Osage County, Oklahoma, and were in possession of other described land in said County; that defendant was “the majority interest owner and the operator of (a) blanket oil mining lease upon” the land; that the lease was “on record at the 'Osage Indian Agency”; that same was by reference made a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Emery v. VillinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. RhodesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Seber v. Spring Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Garrett v. WatsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Tibbets & Pleasant v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fulreader v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Bell v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Crews v. Shell Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. West v. Independent Sch. Dist. No. 2, McClain CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  5. Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API