United States v. Gotti
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
John A. Gotti’s motion under Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure presents an issue of first impression for this Court, and quite possibly for all courts. At the end of Gotti’s trial, the jury deadlocked on three of the four predicate acts charged in support of the substantive racketeering offense. 1 In the ensuing colloquy, the Government argued that the jurors had to be unanimous as to unproven acts as well as proven acts and because their verdict was not unanimous I should declare a mistrial. Gotti argued that the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. John A. GottiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. GottiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- United States v. YannottiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005