Legal Opinion

Heinitsh v. Floyd, Mayor

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 29, 1925No. 11667PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

The petitioner brought this proceeding in the original jurisdiction to enjoin the sale of $1,350,000, City of Spartanburg Waterworks Extension Bonds, on the ground that the proposed issue will create a bonded indebtedness in excess of the constitutional limit imposed on that City by an amendment submitted March 11, 1922 (32 Stat., 1568), and ratified March 20, 1923 (33 Stat., 129).

The city and school district of Spartanburg are coextensive taxing subdivisions, and contain approximately one-third of all the taxable property in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Townsend v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tindall v. BYARSSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  2. Ex Parte Tipton v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  3. Brailsford v. Walker, MayorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  4. Reese v. TalbertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  5. McWhirter v. BridgesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API