Legal Opinion
Idaho Ex Rel. Evans v. Oregon
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 23, 1983No. 67 ORIGPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun
In this action invoking the Court’s original jurisdiction, the State of Idaho seeks an equitable apportionment against the States of Oregon and Washington of the anadromous fish that migrate between the Pacific Ocean and spawning grounds in Idaho. The Special Master has filed his final report on the merits and recommends that the action be dismissed without prejudice. We have before us Idaho’s exceptions to that report.
I
Although somewhat repetitive of the Court’s prior writings in this litigation, 444 U. S. 380 (1980), we feel it worthwhile to outline once again the facts of the case and the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Connecticut v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Nebraska v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Hood Ex Rel. Mississippi v. City of Memphis, Tenn.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Georgia v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. State Of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.