Legal Opinion
Missouri Prosecuting Attorneys & Circuit Attorneys Retirement System v. Pemiscot County
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided June 30, 2008No. SC 88956PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR., Judge.
Pemiscot County and its county commissioners, Charles Moss, Wendell Hoskins, Sr., and David Wilkerson, appeal the entry of summary judgment in favor of the Missouri Prosecuting Attorneys and Circuit Attorneys Retirement System (PACARS), which petitioned for a writ of mandamus to compel the County to pay additional monies into the PACARS retirement fund. The trial court held that the statutory scheme set out in chapter 56 1 for the compensation of prosecuting attorneys violated the Equal Protection Clauses of the federal and state constitutions. Because this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- United C.O.D. v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
- Missouri Prosecuting Attorneys & Circuit Attorneys Retirement System v. Pemiscot CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Kohring v. SnodgrassSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- Miss Kitty's Saloon, Inc. v. Missouri Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
3Cited by17 opinions
- State Ex Inf. Hensley v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Committee for Educational Equality v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Missouri Prosecuting Attorneys v. Barton CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
- School District of Kansas City v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
- Glossip v. Missouri Department of Transportation & Highway Patrol Employees' Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.