Legal Opinion

Glossip v. Missouri Department of Transportation & Highway Patrol Employees' Retirement System

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 29, 2013No. SC 92583PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

This case does not involve a challenge to the Missouri Constitution’s ban on same-sex marriage. That is an issue for another day. Instead, Kelly Glossip, the same-sex partner of a deceased highway patrolman, presents a challenge to two statutes. The first provides benefits to a surviving spouse of a state highway patrolman who is killed in the line of duty. The second statute provides that the word “spouse” in the first statute shall refer only to a marriage between a man and a woman.

Glossip was denied survivor benefits and appeals the circuit court judgment affirming the administrative…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Linda Labrayere as Trustee of the Don E. Labrayere Trust v. Bohr Farms, LLCSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  3. Shonda Ambers-Phillips and Richard Phillips II v. SSM DePaul Health CenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  4. Keeney v. FitchMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. K.M.M. v. K.E.W.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API