Legal Opinion
Missouri Prosecuting Attorneys & Circuit Attorneys Retirement System v. Pemiscot County
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 28, 2007No. 27325PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIP R. GARRISON, Judge.
The Missouri Prosecuting Attorneys and Circuit Attorneys Retirement System (“PACARS”) filed a petition for writ of mandamus against Pemiscot County and its County Commissioners, Charles Moss, Wendell Hoskins, Sr. and David Wilkerson (collectively referred to as “Defendants”). In its petition, PACARS sought to compel Defendants to pay PACARS an amount it believed was required by Section 56.807.5(3). 1 Faced with competing motions for summary judgment, the trial court entered summary judgment in favor of Defendants, which PACARS now appeals. We reverse and remand.
The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. MerrittMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Bumm v. Olde Ivy Development, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Maxwell v. Daviess CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Hatfield v. McCluneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Moto, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Evans v. Empire District Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Missouri Prosecuting Attorneys & Circuit Attorneys Retirement System v. Pemiscot CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- Lemay Fire Protection District v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- S. A. v. MILLERMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- City of Slater, Missouri Municipal League,Christine Cates, Barbara Shaffer and Jacob K. Albarelli v. State of Missouri Office of State Courts Administrator Missouri Sheriff's Retirement SystemMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.