Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Frank Meline Co. v. Kleinberger

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1926No. Docket No. 5303PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of dismissal entered after a nonsuit had been granted, in an action brought to recover real estate commissions.

The material provisions of the contract out of which the controversy grew are as follows:

“Los Angeles, California, Feb. 24, 1922.
“I hereby appoint Frank Meline Company sole agent for the exclusive sale of the here (i)n described property, upon the terms stated; and in case the said property is sold by me or any agent, or any agent of said company sends or introduces to me a customer who buys it, I agree to pay said company five (5) per…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kimmell v. SkellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Twogood v. MonnetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Houston v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Hicks v. ChristesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Purcell v. FirthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Walter v. LibbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Singer v. ChitwoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  4. Frank Meline Co. v. KleinbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Woodbridge Realty v. Plymouth Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API