Legal Opinion

Chickerneo v. Society National Bank of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1979No. 78-697PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaul W. Bkown, J.

The nature of a bank’s right to setoff was described by this court in Bank v. Brewing Co. (1893), 50 Ohio St. 151, at pages 158-159, as follows:

“It is said to be a well settled rule of the law merchant, that a bank has a general lien on all the funds of a depositor in its possession, for any balance due on general account, or other indebtedness contracted in the course of their dealings, and may appropriate the funds to the payment of such indebtedness. The right to make such appropriation, it is held, grows out of the relation of the parties as debtor and creditor, and rests upon the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gugle v. LoeserOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Witham v. South Side Building & Loan Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Vetter v. HamptonOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Beaver v. RedmondOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Falkland v. . St. Nicholas Nat'l B'k of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Daugherty v. Central Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Kiley v. First National BankCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Isaac v. First National Bank of MarylandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. brandon/wiant Co. v. TeamorOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Paradis v. Greater Providence Deposit Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API