Beaver v. Redmond
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellant contends that in order to sustain the joint and survivorship character of a bank account the survivor need prove no more than full compliance with the rules of the bank. We agree with this proposition and therefore disagree with the rationale of the Court of Appeals as expressed in *184the first four paragraphs of its syllabus (8 Ohio App. 2d 80). The accounts in this case were properly created with respect to form.
It does not necessarily follow, however, that the survivor is entitled to the balance of these accounts. As was stated in paragraph three of the syllabus in Fecteau v.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Union Properties, Inc. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
- In Re Estate of SvabOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
3Cited by23 opinions
- Thompson v. BottsOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Wright v. BloomOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Kanawha Valley Bank v. FriendWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
- Eger v. EgerOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- Vetter v. HamptonOhio Supreme Court · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.