Legal Opinion
Gratz v. Bollinger
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 23, 2003No. 02-516PublishedCited by 437 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist
We granted certiorari in this case to decide whether “the University of Michigan’s use of racial preferences in under*250graduate admissions violate[s] the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U. S. C. § 2000d), or 42 U. S. C. § 1981.” Brief *251for Petitioners i. Because we find that the manner in which the University considers the race of applicants in its undergraduate admissions guidelines violates these constitutional and statutory provisions, we reverse that portion of the District Court’s decision upholding the guidelines.
A
Petitioners…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by437 opinions
- Carroll v. NakataniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Bates v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Carney v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- National Wrestling Coaches Ass'n v. Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
432 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.