Legal Opinion
Feris v. Balcom
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 25, 1967PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.
In this suit to foreclose a logger’s lien plaintiffs appeal from an order of the trial court dismissing their complaint. The principal issue is whether an employer is entitled to a logger’s lien for the labor of his employees under ORS 87.125.
The defendants Balcom contracted with the defendant Caff all Brothers Forest Products (Caff all Brothers) to log and haul timber owned by Caff all Brothers. The Balcom’s subcontracted the hauling to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs employed others to help them haul the logs with plaintiffs’ equipment. Part of the logs were hauled by plaintiffs individually and the *345…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mathis v. Thunderbird Village, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
- North Pacific Lumber Co. v. LangOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Campbell v. Sterling Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
- McKinley v. TiceOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Loud v. Gold Ray Realty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Acco Contractors, Inc. v. McNamara & Peepe Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- C & V, Inc. v. Daw Forest Products Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Brazier Forest Products, Inc. v. Northern Transport, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Brazier Forest Products, Inc. v. Northern Transport, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986