Legal Opinion

McKinley v. Tice

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1929PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

Plaintiffs contracted with the Tice Lumber Company, a copartnership, to cut into saw-logs all of the timber on a certain tract of land and to deliver the logs at the sawmill of the copartnership. They delivered, pursuant to the contract, 1,098,000 feet of logs for which there is now due them a balance of $1,451.76. The copartnership sawed the logs into lumber and sold the lumber, a part being purchased by the Nebraska Bridge Supply & Lumber Company and the remainder by the Coast Fir and Cedar Products Company, neither of which companies had any notice of plaintiffs’ claim. The lumber was sold…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Christman v. SalwayOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Alderson v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Loud v. Gold Ray Realty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Ross v. SpaniolOregon Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Diamond National Corporation v. Dale Lee, Trustee in BankruptcyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  2. Phillips v. GravesOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Kidder v. Nekoma Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Acco Contractors, Inc. v. McNamara & Peepe Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Smith v. LichtenthalerOregon Supreme Court · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API