Legal Opinion
Fisher v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 25, 2005No. 03 Civ. 3252(SHS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
STEIN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Isadore Fisher, Janna M. Wooten, Kelli M. Bunn, Tammy T. Soileau and Amy K. Harvey have brought this action for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty in violation of section 409(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1109(a). Plaintiffs, who are present and former participants in JP Morgan Chase & Co.’s 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Plan”), contend that defendants are fiduciaries with respect to the Plan who have breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the investment of Plan funds in JP Morgan Chase…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- DiFelice v. US Airways, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- In re Polaroid Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Rogers v. Baxter International Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Caltagirone v. New York Community Bancorp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Rispler v. Sol Spitz Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2005