Legal Opinion
Rispler v. Sol Spitz Co., Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 6, 2005No. 04-CV-1323DLIARLPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
IRIZARRY, District Judge.
Both parties in the instant Employment Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., matter object to U.S. Magistrate Judge Are-lene R. Lindsay’s Report & Recommendation (“R & R”), dated May 18, 2005, which found an enforceable settlement agreement (“Settlement Agreement”) and required compliance with the provisions of Fed.R.Civ.P. 23.Í (“Rule 23.1”) by directing, inter alia, that absent plan participants be notified of the Settlement Agreement.. After consideration of the entire record and a de novo review of the R & R, see…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Floyd Frank v. Sally B. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Orlando Roldan v. James Racette, Superintendent, Adirondack Correctional Facility, and U.S. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cottam v. Global Emerging Capital Group, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020