Swindle v. State Ex Rel. Pruitt
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The constitutional question is certified by the Court of Appeals to this court for decision under section 7322, Code.
The question is: Did the trial court commit error in granting the writ of mandamus and ordering the writ to issue, commanding respondent, as treasurer of Walker county, to pay the warrant for $15 allowed, drawn, and payable to relator and petitioner as probation officer and clerk of the domestic relations court of Walker county?
The demurrer of respondent, among other things, was on the following ground: “Because that portion of section 2, which provides that the County shall…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ballentyne v. WickershamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Lindsay v. United States Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Alabama State Bridge Corporation v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Sadler v. LanghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- State ex rel. Wilkinson v. LaneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Law v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Dixie Coaches, Inc. v. RamsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.