Jordan v. Henck
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.
In 1929 defendants owned Lots 1 and 2 of Block 10 “Arrowhead Lakeview Forest.” They then sold Lot 1 to another person. After the sale of Lot 1, they purported by grant deed to convey to the State of California a “right of way and incidents thereto for said State Highway upon, over and across . . . blocks ... 10 ... as .. . designated upon that certain map entitled ‘Arrowhead Lakeview Forest’ . . . etc.”
In the year 1947, defendants regained title to said Lot 1. They still owned Lot 2, so that they then owned both Lots 1 and 2. Lot 1 Avas improved with a store building and a gasoline pump.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cave v. CraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Fristoe v. DrapeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Owsley v. HamnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Cheda v. BodkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Quinlan v. NobleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Freightways Terminal Co. v. Industrial & Commercial Construction, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1963
- Hogue v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Leonard v. HaydonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980