Legal Opinion

Bruce v. Ylst

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 10, 2003No. 01-17527PublishedCited by 166 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROTT, Circuit Judge.

I

Vincent C. Bruce appeals the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. He argues that his submission to the court raised genuine issues of material fact with respect to his claims that when prison officials validated him as a prison gang affiliate, they did so in retaliation for his jailhouse lawyering activities and with insufficient evidence. This, he argues, violated his Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal protection, and his First Amendment right to file prison grievances.

The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by166 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Samuel Eric Austin v. Cal A. Terhune, Director, and James Williams, Correctional OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Jones v. CarusoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. Bruce v. YlstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Teahan v. WilhelmDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2007

161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API