Legal Opinion

Shalkhauser v. Beach

Cuyahoga County Probate Court

Decided February 5, 1968No. 712592PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Decatur, General Referee.

This cause concerns the construction of the will of Noble D. Hepburn, deceased, and in particular, Item III (c) of that will. Noble D. Hepburn died August 18,1965, his will was admitted to probate April 20, 1966, by the Probate Court of Cuyahoga County.

Item III (c) of said will provides as follows:(e) Thirty percent (30%) equally among the following who survive me, namely: my father’s brother’s grandson, John H. Beach, and his brothers and sisters, and the nieces and nephews of my deceased mother whose name was Kathline C. Johnston Hepburn.

It is alleged that the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cromer v. PinckneyNew York Court of Chancery · 1848
  2. Everhard v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. In re the Estate of HarrisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  4. Matter of CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Dreier v. DurstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Polen v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Matter of Estate of AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. Tootle v. TootleOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Royston v. WattsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Martin v. Palmer, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API