Legal Opinion

Dreier v. Durst

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1931PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

On July 10, 1915, J. H. Durst was duly appointed and qualified as testamentary trustee under the will of John Dreier. A promissory note for $8,450, secured by a mortgage, executed by John Yuan on April 24, 1915, and due on April 24, 1920, constituted the principal asset of the trust estate which came into the trustee’s possession. On the accounting in the county court the issues finally narrowed down to the trustee’s responsibility for the loss sustained by his acceptance of that note and mortgage as a trust investment, and his failure to enforce payment of that obligation when it became due…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harrison v. First Wisconsin Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Will of Leonard v. IngramWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Will of LeitschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Sloan v. DuffyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Welch v. WelchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Bishop v. HamiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Estate of GehlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Shalkhauser v. BeachCuyahoga County Probate Court · 1968
  5. Estate of Fouks v. SakrisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API