Legal Opinion

Tootle v. Tootle

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1986No. 85-558PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

The issue at bar is whether Thomas Abbott and Megan Abbott Knisley, although adopted, may inherit through or from their mother in a class gift. For the reasons to follow we hold that the adopted children may not inherit where the express intention of the testator is otherwise and, accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Ordinarily R.C. 3107.15(A)(2) places adopted children on the same footing as natural children:

“To. create the relationship of parent and children * * * as if the adopted person were a legitimate blood descendant of the petitioner, for all purposes…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Casey v. GallagherOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Flynn v. BredbeckOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Sandy v. MouhotOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Wills v. Union Savings & Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Shalkhauser v. BeachCuyahoga County Probate Court · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Stevens v. National City BankOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Polen v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Central Trust Co. v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Ohio Citizens Bank v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. In re Guardianship of LombardoOhio Supreme Court · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API