Legal Opinion
Candelaria v. Coughlin
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 10, 1994No. 93 Civ. 3212 (RWS)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Thomas A. Coughlin, III (“Coughlin”), Charles Scully (“Scully”), Robert Greifinger (“Greifinger”), Saundra Johnson (“Johnson”), Christopher Artuz (“Ar-tuz”), (collectively, the “Moving Defendants”), move to reargue the Opinion of this Court, Candelaria v. Coughlin, 93 Civ. 3212, 1994 WL 119146, 1994 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 3999 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 4, 1994) (the “Opinion”), which dismissed the bulk of pro se Plaintiff Juan Candelaria’s (“Candelaria”) claims al*488leging various constitutional and civil rights violations. Candelaria has also moved to reargue certain…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Jordan v. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Cosmas v. HassettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Howard Ayers v. Thomas A. Coughlin, Iii, Commissioner, Harold J. Smith, Superintendent of Attica, S. Kerbein, Correctional OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Griffin Industries, Inc. v. Petrojam, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Mina Investment Holdings Ltd. v. LefkowitzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Davis v. Gap, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Kunica v. St. Jean Financial, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.