Davis v. Gap, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff On Davis (“Davis”) has moved, pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 6.3, for reconsideration of this Court’s opinion of April 9, 1999 (the “Opinion”) granting defendant The Gap Inc.’s (the “Gap”) motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, Davis’ motion is denied.
The Parties
Davis is the creator and designer of Ono-eulii Designs, ornamental metal eyewear, with a place of business located at 209 East 7th Street, New York, New York 10009.
The Gap is incorporated in the state of Delaware. The Gap’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Art Rogers, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Jeff Koons Sonnabend Gallery, Inc., Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Faith Ringgold v. Black Entertainment Television, Inc., Home Box Office, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Morser v. AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMSDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Business Trends Analysts, Inc. v. The Freedonia Group, Inc. And the Freedonia Group, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Range Road Music, Inc. v. Music Sales Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- On Davis v. The Gap, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Padilla v. Maersk Line, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Mangino v. Incorporated Village of PatchogueDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Tho Dinh Tran v. DINH TROUNG TRANDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.