Legal Opinion

Brown v. Kassouf

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 22, 1997No. 95-1596PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Justice.

The district court ruled that a settling and a nonsettling plaintiff were bound by a jury’s verdict that an alleged tortfeasor was not at fault. The plaintiffs’ insurance carrier thereby avoided any obligation to pay underin-sured motorist benefits to the plaintiffs. Only the settling plaintiff appealed. The appeal raises the following question: Was the settling plaintiff so connected in interest with the nonsettling plaintiff as to have had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the fault issue? We say yes and affirm.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

On April 14, 1990,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hunter v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. Goolsby v. DerbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  3. Thomas v. SolbergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  4. Opheim v. American Interinsurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Dettmann v. KruckenbergSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. Penn v. Iowa State Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  3. Van Oort Construction Co. v. Nuckoll's Concrete Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  4. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  5. Howard F. Haberer v. David AmickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API