Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Territory of Oklahoma

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 8, 1900PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from the District Court of Canadian County • before John G. Tarsney, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burford, O. J.:

The plaintiffs in error were convicted of the crime of stealing a horse and sentenced to the penitentiary. They have attempted to bring the cause here for review. The only record before this court is a petition in error, to which is attached a very defective and incomplete transcript, with a defective certificate attached to same. On the filing of this record, it appears that a summons in errpr was issued and served on the county attorney of D county. There is no case in this court which confers jurisdiction to review the errors complained of.

An appeal is…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ensley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Goodwin v. BickfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Tegler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Clemmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Arispi v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API