Legal Opinion

Arispi v. Territory

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 22, 1909No. 2188, Okla. TPublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from, District Court, Caddo County. Adolpho Arispi was convicted of forgery, and brings error..

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

The plaintiff in error, Adolpho Arispi, was prosecuted by indictment, and was tried and convicted of the criminal offense of uttering and passing a forged instrument. At the April, 1907, term of the district court of Caddo county, Okla. T., the jury returned a verdict of guilty, a motion for a new trial was overruled, and on May 8, 1907, the court sentenced the defendant to confinement in the territorial prison for the term of two years at hard labor, and adjudged that he pay the costs of prosecution, to all of which exceptions were allowed. Thereupon the court advised the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bailey v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ensley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Burgess v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Patton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Clemmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Hardy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API