Legal Opinion

United Pacific Insurance v. Bakes

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1937No. 6428PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

Respondent contends that in the portion of section 40-804, I. C. A., as amended by chapter 168, 1933 Session Laws, p. 302, 1 preceding the proviso therein, “gross premiums received” and “collected” means gross premiums less refunds or repayments because of cancelations, alleging in jits complaint that for 1935 it received total premiums of $101,254.64, and that:

“ .... plaintiff (respondent) deducted and took credit for the further sum (further that is than other deductions not involved or pertinent to the issues herein) of $28,019.50 which represented business placed upon its books during the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Stebbins v. RileySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Cook v. MasseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Diefendorf v. GalletIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  4. German Alliance Insurance v. VanCleaveIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Fire Ass'n of Philadelphia v. LoveTexas Supreme Court · 1908

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. J.R. Simplot Company, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. HaworthIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Idaho Telephone Company v. BairdIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Pigg v. BrockmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State Ex Rel. Anderson v. RaynerIdaho Supreme Court · 1939

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API