Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission
Utah Supreme Court
Decided May 9, 1929No. 4801PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCherry, C. J.
This proceeding is to review an award of compensation made by the Industrial Commission under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Comp. Laws 1917, §§ 3061-3165, as amended) in favor of Margaret Reeves, upon findings that she sustained an accidental injury to her back in the course of her employment by S. H. Kress & Co. in its store at Salt Lake City, which resulted in her disability.
The award is assailed upon the grounds (1) that there was no substantial evidence to support the finding of the commission that the disability of the employe was caused by, or was the result of, an accident, and (2)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Guderian v. Sterling Sugar & Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Cooke v. Holland Furnace Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Brown's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Johansen v. Union Stock Yards Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1916
- Esposito v. Marlin-Rockwell CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Schrabauer v. Schneider Engraving Product, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Moody v. State Highway DepartmentIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
- Rosell v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1940
- Pine v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.