Kazan v. Dough Boys, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
This appeal arises from a claim based on the filing of a financing statement with an overly broad description of the property subject to a lien under Revised Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code. A single overarching question is presented: Is it error as a matter of law to rescind a settlement agreement with respect to one party and not the other? In the proceedings below, the trial court awarded Dough Boys, Inc. $60,000 in damages after holding that Nicholas Kazan used his overbroad financing statement to "leverage" a $60,000 settlement payment…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- In the Matter of Amex-Protein Development Corporation, Bankrupt. M. Nolden, Trustee of Estate of Bankrupt v. Plant ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- In Re Bakersfield Westar Ambulance, Inc., Debtor. Randell Parker v. Community First BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Davis v. DykmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hansen v. DavisAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Municipality of Anchorage v. StensethAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Commercial Recycling Center, Ltd. v. Hobbs Industries, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Chambers v. ScofieldAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Ronald P. Alleva a/k/a Ron Alleva; Annette M. Alleva; Alleva Investments, LLC; and Grubstake Auction Company v. Municipality of Anchorage; Heritage Land Bank; Catholic Social Services, Inc.; and Bean's Café, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.