Legal Opinion
Dubay v. Wells
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 6, 2007No. 06-2107PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Matthew Dubay (“Dubay”) appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and its award of attorney fees to Defendants Lauren Wells (“Wells”), Saginaw County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office (the “County”), and Intervenor-Defendant Michael A. Cox, Attorney General of the State of Michigan (“Attorney General”). After Wells told Dubay she was infertile and using birth control, she became pregnant with Du-bay’s child, had the baby, and sued for child support. A Michigan court awarded child support and…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Lambert v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Reilly v. VadlamudiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Theresa Waldo v. Consumers Energy CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- League of Women Voters of Ohio v. BrunnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.