Legal Opinion
Hanley v. Hanley
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided June 28, 1991No. 05-89-01398-CVPublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS, Justice.
Deidre Hanley, Tara Hanley and Ann Hanley1 appeal from the trial court’s judgment striking their pleadings and assessing monetary sanctions against them for alleged discovery abuse. In six points of error appellants contend that: (1) the trial court abused its discretion by striking their pleadings; (2) the trial court abused its discretion by assessing $89,000 in monetary sanctions against them; (3) the sanctions imposed violated the Texas and United States constitutions; (4) the trial court erred by refusing to hear their motion for sanctions; (5) the trial court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bodnow Corp. v. City of HondoTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Koslow's v. MacKieTexas Supreme Court · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Rossa, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1992
- Hoefker v. Elgohary, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- Braden v. South Main BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Jones v. Andrews, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
- Blake v. Dorado, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2006
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.