Legal Opinion

Hoefker v. Elgohary

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided October 25, 2007No. 01-07-00061-CVPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TERRY JENNINGS, Justice.

Appellants, Paul Hoefker and Wilbanks & Hoefker, P.C. (collectively, “Hoefker”), challenge the county court’s judgment, entered after remand from this Court, awarding appellee, Victor S. Elgohary, attorney’s fees as sanctions for discovery abuse. In four issues, Hoefker contends that the county court erred and abused its discretion in “failing to follow this Court’s Opinion and Mandate,” “re-awarding the initial $8,750 in its judgment [and] improperly awarding an additional $10,000 to [Elgohary],” “allowing testimony from [El-gohary’s] attorney,” and “awarding…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. In Re Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Koslow's v. MacKieTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Lofton v. Texas Brine Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Wayne Ventling v. Patricia M. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Sky View at Las Palmas, LLC v. MendezTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Sundance Minerals, L.P. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
  4. in the Interest of M.H., S.H., and G.H., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2010
  5. Louis Cognata v. Down Hole Injection, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API