Stone v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
Appellants were separately indicted for rape. The crimes having been committed, if at all, on the same occasion upon the same victim, the cases were tried together. A verdict of guilty was returned against each of them. Separate records are filed on appeal, each identical with the other, save that a separate indictment, verdict, judgment and sentence appears in each case. The questions raised on appeal being common to all, they are treated together.
Three young men, twenty-six to twenty-eight years of age, shown by unchallenged evidence to have theretofore sustained good…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Fries v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- McDowell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- McQuirk v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- McLeod v. Shelly Manufacturing & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Houston v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- State v. GrundlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- National Security Insurance Company v. ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Chancellor v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.