Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Staten v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 2011No. 87A04-1005-CR-393Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCrone, Judge

The State concedes that it failed to prove that Staten committed the class C traffic infraction with which he was charged, and I concur in the majority’s decision to vacate the trial court’s finding on that count. I respectfully disagree, however, with the majority’s conclusions that (1) the traffic stop was valid and (2) the State presented sufficient evidence to sustain Staten’s conviction for class A misdemeanor operating while intoxicated (“OWI”).

1. Validity of Traffic Stop

“The State has the burden of proving that the investigatory stop of an automobile was not violative of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. PraterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Vanderlinden v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Ransom v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Taylor v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API