Legal Opinion

Runner v. Woitke

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided July 22, 1905No. 222Published

Motion for New Trial. Denied.

1Opinion of the Court

WICKERSHAM, District Judge.

On May 5th defendants filed in this case a “notice of motion for a new trial,” addressed to plaintiff’s attorneys, which, omitting the title of the court, cause, and attorneys addressed, is as follows:

“You will please take notice that the defendant Fred E. Woitke, intends to move the court to vacate and set aside the decision of the court rendered in the above cause, and to grant a new trial of said cause, upon the following grounds, to wit: (1) Newly discovered evidence material to the defendant, which he could not with reasonable diligence have discovered and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Patent Brick Co. v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Directors of Insane Asylum v. WolflyArizona Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Moore v. SteelsmithDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1901
  4. Van Valkenburg v. HuffNevada Supreme Court · 1865

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API