Legal Opinion

Moore v. Steelsmith

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided March 14, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Tried July 12, igoo. March 14, 1901, motion for new trial overruled, and judgment entered for the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, District Judge.

The plaintiff in this case seeks-to recover from the defendants certain mining lands situate on Jack Wade creek, in the District of Alaska, and in his-complaint alleges that on the 18th day of June, 1898, plaintiff,. *123after a discovery of gold thereon, did locate and stake a mining claim upon said Jack Wade creek, in said Jack Wade Creek mining district, which said claim was then called, numbered and known as “Claim No. 5 Above Discovery,” and which extended 1,320 feet up and down stream by 660 feet wide; that said location was made by duly marking and staking the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. North Noonday Mining Co. v. Orient Mining Co.United States Circuit Court · 1880

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Ora Tahoma Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Barnette v. FreemanDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1904
  3. Runner v. WoitkeDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API