Legal Opinion
Marshall Levinson and Rick Levinson v. Jean Charbonnet, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 23, 1992No. 91-9505PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:
In this diversity action, Marshall Levin-son and Rick Levinson (the Levinsons) appeal the district court’s directed verdict in favor of the estate of Jean F. Charbonnet, Jr. and Howard, Weil, Labouisse, Fried-richs, Inc. (Howard Weil). We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
In July 1990, the Levinsons sued Char-bonnet, a stock broker at Howard Weil, for breach of contract and detrimental reliance. Seeking indemnity, Charbonnet filed a third-party complaint against Howard Weil. The Levinsons added Howard Weil as an additional defendant. Before trial, Howard Weil agreed to indemnify…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- John Bailey Contr. v. St., Dept. of Tr. & Dev.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- Sidney Stokes, Cross-Appellant v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Dunham v. DunhamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- SOUTH CENT. BELL TELEPHONE v. Rouse Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Morris v. People's Bank & Trust Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richard L. Conkling v. Bert S. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Bernofsky v. Tulane University Medical SchoolDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1997
- Conkling v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Davis v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998