Legal Opinion
Bernofsky v. Tulane University Medical School
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided April 15, 1997No. Civil Action 95-358PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
BERRIGAN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant, The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund (“Tulane”). Having considered the record, the memoranda of counsel and the law, the Court has determined that the motion should be granted for the following reasons.
The plaintiff, Carl Bernofsky, Ph.D. (“Ber-nofsky”), is a Jewish male who worked in the Biochemistry Department at Tulane’s School of Medicine between 1975 and 1995, when he was terminated at the age of 61. Bernofsky filed this suit for race…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF JOHNSON COUNTYDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Chiro v. Harmony Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Gaunt v. LOUISIANA CITIZENS PROPERTY INS. CORP.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2007
- Samuel M. Canyon v. Entergy Operations, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026