Legal Opinion

Page v. Turk

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 14, 1914No. 2671PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from District Court, Cleveland County; R. McMillan, Judge. Action by Herman Turk against Morgan Sharp and Mary Sharp, his wife, and Albert S. Page. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Albert S. Page brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLoofbourrow, J.

On February 18, 1909, in the district court of Cleveland county, the defendant in error Herman Turk sued Morgan Sharp and Mary Sharp, his wife, and Albert S. Page, plaintiff in error, to clear his title to the N. E. pi of section 29, township 10, range 3, W. I. M. After alleging himself to be the owner thereof, in fee simple, and in posesssion, petitioner deraigned his title thereto by -a foreclosure proceeding, resulting in a sheriff’s deed to him, dated May 13, 1897, duly recorded. He further alleges that the defendant Page claimed some interest in said land adverse to him by virtue of a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Goodenow v. EwerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Lessee of Gantly v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. Boggs v. Fowler & HargraveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Gillett v. RomigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Winters v. Oklahoma Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Coursey v. FairchildSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Turk v. PageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Mann v. WhitelyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Methvin v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API