In Re Hoisington's Estate

(dissenting) Appellant strenuously urges that the court is prohibited from reading into the will by aid of extrinsic evidence matter foreign thereto which is patently erroneous as to the devisees or the property devised and that the court ought not to make the testator’s will the instrument itself being clear and concise both as to its terms and as to the disposition of her property. Further that one cannot point out any proposition upon the face of the instrument shpwing any defect in form or thought. That the rule of law permitting the admission of extrinsic evidence to clarify on the…