Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lawson v. Bishop

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1920No. Docket No. 10Published

Appeal from Oceana; Vanderwerp (John), J. Bill by Philip H. Lawson against John Bishop and others to quiet title to land. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiff appeals.

1ConcurrenceSharpe, J.

I am unable to concur in the conclusion reached by Mr. Justice Clark. While plaintiff alleges in the first paragraph of his bill of complaint that he had been the owner of said lands “for a period of more than 15 years theretofore, claiming under and by virtue of five certain tax deeds,” in the second paragraph he claims that he has. become such owner in fee simple by reason of his adverse possession thereof for more than 15 years. The trial judge found that

“the evidence fairly establishes that he (plaintiff) has been in continuous possession of this land ever since he went into possession…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barnard v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Bower v. EarlMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Holmes v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Cook Land, Construction & Producing Co. v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. St. Mary's Power Co. v. Chandler-Dunbar Water-Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API