Legal Opinion

Smith v. Garside

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1960No. 4284PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, J.:

Plaintiff below, appellant herein, commenced a common-law action for damages by reason of becoming afflicted with a chest infection which developed into idiopathic pericarditis and then into systemic lupus erythemotosis, all alleged to result from the negligence of defendants in failing properly to heat the building where she was employed. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s case, the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss under Rule 41 (b) NRCP. This appeal followed.

Defendants, plaintiff’s employers, had accepted the provisions of the Industrial Insurance Act,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McColl v. SchererNevada Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Sonson v. ArbogastIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Jones v. YANKEE HILL BRICK MANUFACTURING COMPANYNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Pershing Quicksilver Co. v. ThiersNevada Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Higgins v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. American International Vacations v. MacBrideNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Law Offices of Barry Levinson, P.C. v. MilkoNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Spencer v. Harrah's Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Smith v. GarsideNevada Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Palmer v. Del Webb's High SierraNevada Supreme Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API