Higgins v. Department of Labor & Industries
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
Appellant, who lives in Everett, went to Han-ford, Washington, in October, 1943, to go to work as a truck driver for E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Inc., hereinafter called Du Pont, on the so-called Hanford project. Physical examination disclosed that he had high blood pressure, and he was refused employment. He then worked as a truck driver for one of the subcontractors on that project, and, in December, 1943, he was hired by Du Pont, apparently without a medical examination, as a fireman for stationary boilers.
He worked in that capacity from December 4, 1943, to June 8, 1944, averaging…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McCormick Lumber Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Seattle Can Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Metcalf v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Frandila v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Henson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Windust v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Petersen v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- MacKlanburg-duncan Company v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Favor v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- Merritt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.