Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1947No. 29926PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

Appellant, who lives in Everett, went to Han-ford, Washington, in October, 1943, to go to work as a truck driver for E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Inc., hereinafter called Du Pont, on the so-called Hanford project. Physical examination disclosed that he had high blood pressure, and he was refused employment. He then worked as a truck driver for one of the subcontractors on that project, and, in December, 1943, he was hired by Du Pont, apparently without a medical examination, as a fireman for stationary boilers.

He worked in that capacity from December 4, 1943, to June 8, 1944, averaging…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McCormick Lumber Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Seattle Can Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Metcalf v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Frandila v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Henson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Windust v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Petersen v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. MacKlanburg-duncan Company v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Favor v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Merritt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API