Legal Opinion
State v. Strano
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 21, 2004No. AC 23929PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendant, Ronald F. Strano, appeals from the judgments of conviction, rendered following his conditional pleas of nolo contendere, of robbery in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-135 under fifteen separate docket numbers and attempt to commit robbery in the second degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 and 53a-135 under one docket number, for which his sentences on all docket numbers were enhanced pursuant to General Statutes § 53-202k as a result of the defendant’s having committed class A, B or C felonies with a firearm. On appeal, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. KylesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. FedericiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. SantosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HernandezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. TuckConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. StranoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004