(PC) Beaton v. State of California, CDCR
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAUL NIVARD BEATON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01072-JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO 13 v. STATE A CLAIM 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants. 16 17 The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that it fails to state a cognizable claim 18 for relief. (Doc. 7.) The Court provided Plaintiff with the legal standards for multiple causes of 19 action and granted him leave to amend. (Id. at 4-7.) Plaintiff then filed a first amended complaint.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.