Legal Opinion

(PC) Beaton v. State of California, CDCR

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 29, 2020No. 1:19-cv-01072Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAUL NIVARD BEATON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01072-JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO 13 v. STATE A CLAIM 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants. 16 17 The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that it fails to state a cognizable claim 18 for relief. (Doc. 7.) The Court provided Plaintiff with the legal standards for multiple causes of 19 action and granted him leave to amend. (Id. at 4-7.) Plaintiff then filed a first amended complaint.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API