Legal Opinion
Arsenault v. Crossman
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided May 5, 1997PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Richard Crossman appeals from the order of the Superior Court (Androscoggin County, Delahanty, J.) awarding him costs pursuant to M.R.CivJ?. 68.1 On appeal, Crossman contends that the trial court erred by determining that the Rule allowed it to exercise discretion in reducing the amount of costs awarded. We disagree and affirm the judgment.
*419[¶ 2] Heidi Arsenault brought suit against Richard Crossman seeking compensation for the injuries she suffered in an automobile accident. More than 10 days before trial, Crossman offered to allow judgment pursuant to M.R.Civ.P. 68 in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Finks v. Maine State Highway CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- Town of Arundel v. SwainSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- Franklin Property Trust v. Foresite, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- State v. FournierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Maine State Society for the Protection of Animals v. WarrenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Wage Payment LitigationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Darling's v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Maine Family Federal Credit Union v. Sun Life Assurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Lindemann v. Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election PracticesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Burke v. Port Resort Realty Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.