Legal Opinion

State v. Fournier

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 30, 1992PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Justice.

Michael Fournier appeals from his convictions entered on a jury verdict in Superi- or Court (Cumberland County, Lipez, J.) on fifteen counts of theft by receiving stolen property and one count of negotiating a worthless instrument. 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 359 & 708 (1983 & Supp.1991). Because the State impermissibly aggregated the amount of stolen property the defendant received into several separate theft counts, we modify the judgment to reflect a single conviction of theft and a single conviction of negotiating a worthless instrument. As so modified, we remand to the Superior…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BarrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  2. State v. EDWARD C.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  3. State v. NilesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  4. Mullen v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  5. State v. AllardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. FortuneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  2. Maine Family Federal Credit Union v. Sun Life Assurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  3. State v. StevensSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  4. State of Maine v. Damien OsbornSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023
  5. Arsenault v. CrossmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API